
It is not our aim, in this editorial, to offer a final definition of research ethics or ethics in scientific publishing, especially at a time when we are increasingly connected and are still learning to deal with the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI). It would be unreasonable to assume that readers are unfamiliar with the stages of research or with the ethical principles that should guide scientific work. Researchers can usually explain what they study, which methods they use, and how their collaborations are organized. They also know, at least in general terms, which rules must be followed. Yet knowing these elements does not remove the questions that arise during research or, by itself, ensure that every decision will be right.
Veja também
ESTAMOS SEGUROS? SEGURANÇA QUÍMICA EM TEMPOS DE AGROTÓXICOS E ARMAS QUÍMICAS
This editorial discusses the importance of chemical safety and security, highlighting the risks associated with…
QN – Artigo em Destaque de Novembro/2026
⚛️ QN Volume 49, Artigo em Destaque de Novembro! ⚛️.🔗 Acesse o nosso website: https://quimicanova.sbq.org.br/.📖…
Why Scientific Societies Matter – Who Speaks for Science?
This editorial highlights the essential role of scientific societies in representing researchers, advancing science education,…
JBCS – Artigo em Destaque de Novembro/2026
⚛️ JBCS Volume 37 – Featured Article – November ⚛️.🔗 Check out at our website…

